I am no journalist or anything as you can tell by my chaos pocket I run here. However, I really think author screwed the pooch on this article;
Scroll down to number 14. I am fairly certain they meant to write about Drayson Bowman, and were flustered or something. Maybe they could not properly convey his awesomeness into words. I don’t know. But I know of someone besides me who can pen something about Bowman supreme fantastic nature.
Also, I am a little hurt that no Chiefs are named in the article. But I hold out on grabbing my torch and pitchfork until next week’s installment. Then you can imagine if Ondrej Roman is missing, I will start a riot.
Read number 9. That one made me laugh. For like 4 minutes.
5 responses so far ↓
loser domi // May 7, 2008 at 3:48 pm
hehe, they said scuttlebutt
wraparoundcurl // May 7, 2008 at 6:35 pm
Yeah, I had no idea people still said that.
"dave schultz" // May 7, 2008 at 7:47 pm
thanks for the props. and as you know, i’m a mad WAC supporter, but I feel I must point out that the article is about the upcoming draft and that is why my baby Bowman isn’t mentioned. As for Beach, the praise/condemnation has put him as high as 2nd in some rankings, and not even in the 1st round in others. whatev. I totally hate him but when/if he chooses to shut his mouth and just play, he can be dangerous. and I can respect that. I DON’T respect him because of all the other antics, but i’m just sayin. thanks again for the love.
wraparoundcurl // May 7, 2008 at 7:59 pm
Alright, I will allow the lack of Bowman. Which makes sense. So here’s hoping they mention some other Chiefs then.
And I agree Beach is a great player. But he should be seen and not heard. He needs to close his trap and play some freaking hockey.
wraparoundcurl // May 7, 2008 at 8:07 pm
Also, this serves me right for posting before I am totally awake.
Like gas stations in rural Texas after 10 pm, comments are closed.